Home is behind, the world ahead and there are many paths to tread through shadows to the edge.

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.


On August 27,2021 the Maryland State Board of Education voted to circumvent the rights of local jurisdictions and implement an emergency regulation that would authorize them to mandate masks for all Maryland students and staff during the 2021-2022 school year.
While the CDC recommended masking in schools for all students and staff this year, Governor Hogan said he would not issue a statewide mask mandate and preferred to leave those decisions up to local districts. The law supports this. Of the 24 jurisdictions in Maryland, all but five Maryland countieschose to implement mask policies for the coming school year.
Unsatisfied that all counties didn’t implement a mask requirement, Senate President Bill Ferguson sent a letter signed by 32 senators to the Maryland State Board of Education encouraging them to exercise their authority to impose universal masking requirements in Maryland schools under an emergency regulation.

Maryland State Superintendent of Schools Mohammed Choudhurry also signaled support of this measure.

Upon receipt of that letter, the Maryland State Board of Education called for an impromptu meeting on August 26th at 3PM where all but one member voted in favor of an emergency regulation to implement universal masking in Maryland schools.

The official emergency regulation, once available, will be viewable here.
The final step requires the Joint Committee on Administrative, Executive, and Legislative Review (AERL) to approve the emergency regulation proposal. The regulation cannot go into effect until the AERL approves the measure.

There is still time for you to voice your opposition to this measure!Why ICM Opposes Statewide School Mask Mandates

  • This motion by the State Board of Education circumvents the rights of individual jurisdictions to preside over their territory
  • The use of medical face masks in community settings produces no statistically significant effect in reducing the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
  • Prevention measures used for adults do not necessarily convey benefit to children, and may confer unique harms; data shows children have better outcomes from Covid-19 infections and are at incredibly low statistical risk of serious complications or death from Covid infection. 
  • Further, according to a study published in the Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in schools is extremely low. Children are at very low risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2, per The Lancet. The BMJnotes, children do not transmit SARS-CoV-2 through asymptomatic infection.
  • Masking in schools does not protect families at home. Adults living with children have no increased risk of serious outcomes from Covid-19 compared to adults not living with children. 
  • Constant masking only reduces the risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 at best by a .09 to .6 odds ratio. “Therefore, the strength of evidence for mask use and risk for SARS-CoV-2 in community settings remained insufficient,” according to the Annals of Internal Medicine.
  • A compilation of data published in the International Journal of Environment Research and Public Health shows extended use of masks causes numerous adverse effects to both psychological and physical health.
  • Parents retain the right under law to decide which healthcare interventions and prevention measures are best for their children

Who to Contact About These BillsURGENT: We’re asking all members to call and email the Joint Committee on Administrative, Executive, and Legislative Review (AERL) and let them know, in your own words, why you oppose this emergency regulation proposal!
The AERL may or may not request a hearing to discuss the proposed emergency regulation, at the discretion of its members. In absence of a hearing, the Committee may be polled by their staff as soon as 10 business days following receipt of the emergency regulation proposal.

Please copy and paste the following email addresses of the Joint Committee on Administrative, Executive, and Legislative Review members into the BCC section of your email:
[email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected]

Please call the offices of the Joint Committee on Administrative, Executive, and Legislative Review members:
Augustine, Malcolm410-841-3745 | 301-858-3745

Read the Box

Buckel, Jason410-841-3404 | 301-858-3404Carter, Jill410-841-3697 | 410-858-3697Cassilly, Robert410-841-3158 | 301-858-3158Eckhardt, Adelaide C.410-841-3590 | 301-858-3590Elfreth, Sarah K.410-841-3578 | 301-858-3578 Hayes, Antonio410-841-3656 | 301-858-3656 Hershey, Jr., Stephen S.410-841-3639 | 301-858-3639 Holmes, Jr., Marvin E.410-841-3310 | 301-858-3310Jacobs, Jay A.410-841-3449Lierman, Brooke E.410-841-3319 | 301-858-3319McComas, Susan K.410-836-9449Reznik, Kirill410-841-3039 | 301-858-3039 Rosenberg, Samuel L.410-841-3297 | 301-858-3297 Sample-Hughes, Sheree410-841-3427 | 301-858-3427 Shoemaker, Haven410-841-3359 | 410-841-3359Smith, Jr., William C.410-841-3634 | 301-858-3634 Waldstreicher, Jeff410-841-3137 | 301-858-3137Young, Ronald N.301-662-8520

Informed Choice Maryland is a 501(c)4 organization run entirely by volunteers. Your contributions of any amount help make our work possible. Please consider donating to Informed Choice Maryland by clicking here.

Original information published by Informed Choice Maryland Team

Previous Post

Peter Franchot Would Turn History Into “Door Knobs”

Next Post

Maryland 4-H mandates experimental Covid-19 vaccines on children

Related Posts